2013. február 3., vasárnap

A Discursive Essay

   In the  last few years, crime has been going up in Serbia. The most common crimes are  burglary, mugging, stabbing, vandalism etc.  One of the reason for this is possibly the fact that Serbia is a poor country. Another reason is that people just keep losing their jobs and they cant find an other one and they become desperate, so because of this they turn to crimes. Many people fell that is the only solution. Others do it just to have more money or just for fun. People are so greedy nowadays. So what kind of a punishment they deserve?Due to an increase of crime we should definitely do something. There is a rule that you can steal under 10.000 dinars and you would get away with that, because its allowed. I think we should erase this rule.I think the solution would be like "three strikes and you're out".
   The arguments for are that people would watch out what they do and how many crimes they did. One of the benefits would be that  they wouldn't do more crimes more than 2, because they would get hard punishment for that. Another advantage would be that we could  lock out the real outlaws. People make mistakes and we shouldn't  judge them by that just one mistake.
   One of the arguments against is that maybe they would take advantage in this situation, like they will do 2 crimes conscious. Maybe everyone would do just 2 crimes, because they think its free or they think that if others can get with crimes so easily away they should take advantage to. 
    All thing considered its really hard to make a right decision. Everyone has a different opinion of how we should threat criminals. My opinion is that we should do voting, than everybody would give their opinion. And in the end we should decide what is the best solution of this.



   
  

1 megjegyzés:

  1. I suggest that more psychologists should work on getting people to the right way in prisons.

    VálaszTörlés